JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 8, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Bernardo Salazar Parra

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-063/98.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Carácter excepcional
  • Procedencia
  • Procedencia por desconocimiento de la cosa juzgada constitucional
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia C-063/98, propuesta por el accionante toda vez que de acuerdo al análisis que efectuó la Corte, la llevó a pronunciarse necesariamente sobre la temporabilidad de los efectos producidos tanto por la norma acusada, como por la que la había derogado, como expresamente se dijo en la sentencia que se solicita anular.

Pronunciamiento que, en ningún caso, se constituyó en un desconocimiento de la cosa juzgada contenida en la Sentencia C-185/97.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia C-063 del 5 de marzo de 1998, propuesta por el ciudadano Bernardo Salazar Parra.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.